Geopolitics and war risk insurance

9. June 2026

Sigorney Lau, Executive Director & General Manager, CMB Wing Lung Insurance Co., Ltd. and a member of the IUMI Executive Committee

 Current geopolitical conflicts are doing more than creating short-term market volatility; they are fundamentally reshaping maritime risk management. For the global shipping industry, war risk insurance is evolving from a reactive operational cost into a pillar of long-term strategic governance.

From regional to global shifts

Historically, the impact of geopolitical conflict on insurance was regional and phased. Risks were managed through localised price adjustments and case-by-case underwriting without disrupting the broader insurance framework. Shipping companies typically responded with temporary measures such as rerouting vessels. This allowed the market to maintain a steady equilibrium where risks were adjusted without triggering systemic disruptions.

Today, however, conflicts are more interconnected and persistent. This shift has expanded high-risk zones to include major maritime transit corridors, requiring a complete redefinition of standard coverage terms and risk assessment standards across the global supply chain.

Current market impact and disruptions

The current landscape has significantly transformed underwriting logic. General coverage in volatile waters is no longer guaranteed; instead, single-voyage special assessments have become the industry standard. This change places a much higher demand on shipping companies to provide detailed risk management plans for every transit.

Beyond that, as global risks rise, insurance capacity in high-risk regions has tightened. The industry now faces a dual challenge: managing increased operational uncertainty while navigating limited coverage availability in critical zones. This imbalance requires a shift from passive avoidance to a more holistic approach to risk governance.

Strategies for proactive governance

To adapt to these structural shifts, the shipping and insurance sectors must move toward integrated, full-chain cooperation:

  • Intelligence sharing: Leveraging industry platforms to integrate maritime safety intelligence allows for the creation of dynamic early-warning systems. Using data proactively helps mitigate threats before they escalate.
  • Strategic partnerships: Insurers are evolving into strategic risk partners. Increased transparency regarding vessel operations helps insurers deliver fairer assessments, resolving information gaps between both parties.
  • Diversified models: Exploring a mix of commercial, mutual and policy-backed insurance is essential. Initiatives like the Hong Kong Marine War Risks Insurance Pool have proven effective in bridging coverage gaps during periods of extreme market volatility. It leverages integrated underwriting strengths and professional knowledge to safeguard high-risk shipping routes.

Notably, many leading shipowners have maintained strong performance in high-risk areas through robust safety management. This confirms that high-quality operational control remains the most effective way to reduce claim exposures and ensure long-term resilience.